site stats

Curcini v. county of alameda

WebCurcini v. County of Alameda. Filed 6/5/08 Curcini v. County of Alameda CA1/2. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS. California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). WebPlaintiffs filed a class action complaint alleging causes of action for violations of the Labor Code and the Industrial Welfare Commission's (IWC) wage orders based on the City's alleged failure to pay workers employed as pages and recreation leader specialists wages at or above the statewide minimum wage.

Gossai v. Golbari, No. B289494 Casetext Search + Citator

WebMay 22, 2024 · 30 Cal.App.4th at p. 285; Dimon v. County of Los Angeles (2008) 166 Cal.App.4th 1276, 1279, 1281; Curcini v. County of Alameda (2008) 164 Cal.App.4th 629, 643.) So while the Legislature can impose procedures regarding labor relations, in cannot impose substantive requirements that interfere with the county’s ultimate right to set … Web(Stearn v. County of San Bernardino (2009) 170 Cal.App.4th 434, 439.) We evaluate whether a cause of action has been stated under any legal theory. (Curcini v. County of Alameda (2008) 164 Cal.App.4th 629, 637 (Curcini).) As we do so, we assume the truth of the petition's properly pleaded facts and judicially noticed matters. (Schifando v. City ... the silent halls map https://goboatr.com

20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, …

WebJul 2, 2008 · Curcini v. County of Alameda The Recorder The Recorder provides legal … WebJul 1, 2008 · Curcini v. County of Alameda California Court of Appeals, First District, … my toyota rav4 won\\u0027t start

Recent Limitation on Home Rule Doctrine: Charter Cities and Likely …

Category:Marquez v. City of Long Beach :: 2024 - Justia Law

Tags:Curcini v. county of alameda

Curcini v. county of alameda

Fear Not Law Articles: Curcini v. County of Alameda

WebSep 16, 2008 · In Curcini v. County of Alameda (2008) 164 Cal.App.4th 629, 79 … WebCurcini v. County of Alameda (2008) 164 Cal.App.4th 629, 79 Cal.Rptr.3d 383 (Curcini) explains that, among the powers specifically delegated to charter counties under section 4 of article XI of the California Constitution “is control over matters of employee compensation.” (Curcini, at p. 640, 79 Cal.Rptr.3d 383.) ...

Curcini v. county of alameda

Did you know?

WebFeb 25, 2024 · County of Los Angeles (2008) 166 Cal.App.4th 1276, 1284, 83 Cal.Rptr.3d 576 ( Dimon) [finding conflict between state meal period requirements and county charter where "MOU specifically covers meal periods" in a different manner from state requirements]; Curcini v. County of Alameda (2008) 164 Cal.App.4th 629, 648, 79 … WebAs alleged in the complaints, appellants Curcini, Devore and Jones (chaplains) are …

WebThe court explained that the home rule doctrine gives the county the exclusive right to … WebJul 15, 2009 · Curcini v. County of Alameda CARSON CURCINI et al., Plaintiffs and …

WebCARSON CURCINI et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA et al., Defendants and Respondents. A115652. California Court of Appeal, First District, Second Division. July 1, 2008. Opinion Filed Date 6/5/08. Trial Court Superior Court of Alameda County, No. RG-05-218452 Trial Judges Hon. Steven Brick, Hon. Frank Roesch WebCurcini v. County of Alameda In Curcini v. County of Alameda (2008) 164 Cal.App.4th 629 (Curcini) [no petn. for review filed], the court considered a claim very similar to the one advanced in this case. In Curcini, several county employees sued Alameda County—a charter county—for, among other things, violation of the state laws

WebCarson Curcini and other fellow chaplains at a county jail brought a lawsuit against the …

Web(Curcini v. County of Alameda (2008) 164 Cal.App.4th 629, 637 (Curcini).) In making our determination, we admit all facts properly pleaded (Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital Dist. (1992) 2 Cal.4th 962, 967); we “ ‘give the complaint a reasonable interpretation, reading it … the silent hill everyone hatedWebJul 1, 2008 · City of Oakland v. Hassey, 163 Cal. App. 4th 1477 (2008). Cf. Curcini v. County of Alameda, 164 Cal. App. 4th 629 (2008) (overtime, meal and rest break compensation requirements of Labor Code do not apply to county employees).. Tags: final paycheck, final wages, reimbursement, repayment, training the silent heroes movieWebCARSON CURCINI et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA et al., … my toyota sequoia rear hatch won\\u0027t lockWebDiv. Two upheld a judgment in favor of Alameda County, concluding that issues of overtime pay, meal and rest breaks, and payment for denying meal and rest breaks, addressed matters of “compensation” within the county’s exclusive constitutional purview. Carson Curcini, Kinwood Devore and Johnny Jones worked as chaplains at the Santa Rita Jail. my toyota my futureWebJun 5, 2008 · Curcini and Jones worked for the County of Alameda from February 2002 … my toyota schweizWeb[Cits.]" Stephens v. State, 196 Ga. App. 29 (1) (395 SE2d 353) (1990). The trial court … my toyota rewards visa loginWebJul 2, 2008 · The Recorder provides legal news and analysis that helps lawyers run their firms and practices and navigate the innovation economy in Northern California with an emphasis on the intersection of ... the silent highwayman meaning